MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406120992 · doi:10.18272/rea.i2.3608

Arbitraje Comercial Internacional en Chile: Una mirada jurisprudencial

2025· article· es· W4406120992 on OpenAlexaff
Elina Mereminskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Ecuatoriana de Arbitraje · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Arbitration and Investment Law
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La legislación que rige el arbitraje en Chile remonta sus orígenes a fines del siglo XIX, más precisamente, a la Ley Orgánica de Tribunales del año 1875. Las disposiciones fundamentales por las que actualmente se rige el arbitraje interno o doméstico en Chile, se encuentran contempladas en el Título IX, Arts. 222 al 243 del Código Orgánico de Tribunales (COT) del año 1903 y en el Título VIII del Libro III, Arts. 628 al 644 del Código de Procedimiento Civil (CPC) del año 1943.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Ecuatoriana de ArbitrajeSame topicInternational Arbitration and Investment LawFrench-language works237,207