MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406121984 · doi:10.1016/j.hnm.2025.200298

Metabolite profiling in assessing ulcerative colitis activity: A systematic review

2025· review· en· W4406121984 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xu Han, Yanhong Wang, Zijia Chen, Gong Yang, Miao Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Nutrition & Metabolism · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsUlcerative colitisMetabolite profilingProfiling (computer programming)MetaboliteComputational biologyMedicineInternal medicineComputer scienceBiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory condition of the colon, characterized by defects in the intestinal epithelial barrier, dysbiosis of the microbiota, and immune dysregulation. Metabolite profile has been widely and successfully used to characterize patient features in UC, as the development of metabolomics technology. Specific combinations of small metabolites can accurately depict the real-time pathological state of the body. Previous systematic reviews have focused on metabolite analysis between UC patients and healthy individuals, but have not systematically evaluated metabolite changes in different disease stages. This study focused on distinguish between patients in active and inactive phases, and even have the potential to predict changes in disease activity. Aim: To summarize the distinct metabolites between the active and remission phases in serum and colonic mucosa in patients with UC. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from 1995 to 2022. Studies were selected which included metabolomics detection on serum or mucosal samples from patients with active or remission phase UC. The disease activity was assessed by using the Mayo score, Ulcerative colitis activity index score, or Geboes score. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Eleven articles (10 in English and 1 in Chinese) and 357 patients were included. Qualitative analysis was performed according to the classification of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, or nuclear magnetic resonance. In the active period of UC, metabolites such as lipids, Amino acids showed a certain trend of change. Arachidonic acid showed specific upregulation in both serum and mucosal samples during the active stage in patients with UC. Conclusion: There exists an association between metabolite profile and disease activity in patients with UC. Especially in patients with active UC, the lipid metabolite (arachidonic acid) is highly expressed simultaneously in the serum and mucosa. This finding will identify small molecule biomarkers that may potentially replace colonoscopy in the assessment and prediction of UC disease activity in the future, which indicates a significant potential for biomarker development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.007
Bibliometrics0.0140.015
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Nutrition & MetabolismSame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207