MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406124296 · doi:10.26034/la.atl.2011.445

Core drilling of Quaternary sediments for luminescence dating using the Dormer Drillmite

2011· article· en· W4406124296 on OpenAlexafffund
Kennedy Munyikwa, Matt W. Telfer, Ian Baker, Christopher D. Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueAncient TL · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAthabasca University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAthabasca University
KeywordsQuaternaryGeologyDrillingCore (optical fiber)Thermoluminescence datingPaleontologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The coring of buried Quaternary deposits using a Dormer DrillmiteTM auger permits the extraction of samples for luminescence dating from depths of up to 20 m. The unit is powered hydraulically and features portability as one of its main advantages. While a range of other power drilling methods have been used successfully for sample collection in a number of luminescence dating studies, there is a dearth of literature that describes such drilling methods in detail. The absence of such information belies the importance of sampling methods in luminescence dating. This contribution aims to play a role in addressing that deficit. The basic operational features of the DrillmiteTM are outlined and we share some experiences we have had coring with the unit. Adaptations that can be made to the equipment to suit different circumstances are explored. The advantages and drawbacks of core drilling at depth for luminescence dating are also briefly examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAncient TLSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207