Definitions of Hemodynamic Instability Related to Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review Protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Hemodynamic instability related to renal replacement therapy (HIRRT) is a common complication affecting critically ill patients that require renal replacement therapy (RRT). There is currently no consensus regarding the definition of HIRRT in critically ill patients. In this context, the impacts of HIRRT on clinical outcomes such as mortality or renal recovery in critically ill patients are unclear. Objective: The primary objective of this proposed systematic review is to evaluate the association between HIRRT and clinical outcomes, as reported within randomized control trials in the literature. The secondary objective of this systematic review is to compare rates of HIRRT, according to various definitions used by randomized controlled trials, across different RRT modalities used to treat critically ill patients, with the goal of paving the way toward a common definition of HIRRT for future research. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Measurements: The rates of HIRRT, mortality, and renal recovery will be reported according to each definition of HIRRT. Patients: Critically-ill adults with acute kidney injury admitted to intensive care units. Methods: The search strategy will be developed to identify articles in Medline, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL Registry. We will include randomized control trials examining renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients. This will include intermittent hemodialysis (iHD), all forms of prolonged intermittent RRT (PIRRT), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Only articles that report a definition of HIRRT and the rates of HIRRT will be included in our analysis. Two reviewers will independently screen all articles for inclusion and exclusion. Data extraction and quality assessment will be also performed in duplicate. All disagreements will be resolved through discussion or a third reviewer. Limitations: The heterogeneity in the definitions of HIRRT and outcome reporting may limit the ability to perform meta-analysis and perform comparisons in the rates of HIRRT between RRT modalities. Conclusions: This systematic review aims to assess the association between HIRRT and important clinical outcomes. In doing so, we will identify definitions of HIRRT within the current literature and the rates of HIRRT associated with these definitions. HIRRT can result in early discontinuation of dialysis, organ injury from hypoperfusion, and may negatively impact mortality and renal recovery in critically ill patients. This systematic review will synthesize the impact and frequency of HIRRT reported in the literature and, in doing so, may help determine the extent to which common definitions of HIRRT might be recommended for standardized use in future research related to HIRRT. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023396550.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.049 | 0.059 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".