MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406128355 · doi:10.3389/aot.2024.1501208

Pruning and optimization of optical neural network as a binary optical trigger

2025· article· en· W4406128355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBinary numberArtificial neural networkComputer sciencePruningArtificial intelligenceMathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical neural networks implemented with Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) arrays are a promising solution to enable fast and energy-efficient machine learning inference, yet finding a practical application has proven challenging due to sensitivity to thermal noise and loss. To leverage the distinct advantages of integrated optical processors while avoiding its shortcomings given the current state of optical computing, we propose the binary optical trigger as a promising field of application. Implementable as small-scale application-specific circuitry on edge devices, the binary trigger runs binary classification tasks and output binary signals to decide if a subsequent energy intensive system should activate. Motivated by the limited task complexity, constrained area and power budgets of binary triggers, we perform 1) systematic, application-specific hardware pruning by physically removing specific MZIs, and 2) application-specific optimizations in the form of false negative reduction and weight quantization, as well as 3) sensitivity studies capturing the effect of imperfections in real optical components. The result is a customized MZI-mesh topology, MiniBokun Mesh, whose structure provides adequate performance and robustness for a targeted task complexity. We demonstrate in simulation that the pruning methodology achieves at least 50% less MZI usage compared to Clements and Reck meshes with the same input size, translating to at least between 4.6% and 24.2% savings in power consumption and a 40% reduction in physical circuitry footprint compared to other proposed unitary MZI topologies, sacrificing only 1%–2% drop in inference accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it