MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406128857 · doi:10.24294/jipd9808

The structure of the Hungarian insurance market and the invariant distribution of market shares

2025· article· en· W4406128857 on OpenAlexaff
Norbert Kovács, Dávid Fülep, István Harmati, Krisztián Koppány, Lóránt Dénes Dávid

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Infrastructure Policy and Development · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInsurance and Financial Risk Management
Canadian institutionsSavaria (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarket share analysisMarket shareMarket structureFactor marketDistribution (mathematics)Market concentrationEconomicsMarket microstructureLife insuranceIndex (typography)BusinessMicroeconomicsOrder (exchange)Actuarial scienceFinanceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hungarian economy exhibits a notable underinsurance phenomenon, with insurance penetration at a mere 2.8%, significantly lower than the European Union average of 8%. This situation indicates substantial growth potential within the Hungarian insurance market, particularly in the life and non-life insurance sectors, contingent upon the development of solvent demand and favorable demand-stimulating factors. Anticipated transformations in the structure of the Hungarian insurance market may arise due to both endogenous and exogenous influences, likely resulting in heightened market concentration and alterations in competitive dynamics. This study aims to conduct an analysis of the historical and expected future transformations of the Hungarian insurance market structure by utilizing publicly available data on gross premium income. The analysis employs traditional market structure indicators, such as market shares, concentration ratios, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), while also examining market share transitions through the application of the Markov chain method. Markov transition probabilities offer a more accurate representation of historical market structure processes compared to conventional market structure indicators. Furthermore, the calculation of these transition probabilities facilitates the prediction of anticipated future changes in market shares. The stationary (ergodic) distribution of market shares, derived from the transition probability matrix, denotes a market share distribution toward which the market converges under stable conditions. This approach also enables the computation of an equilibrium market share distribution achievable in the future under specified conditions, driven by the internal mechanisms of the market. The analysis reveals an upward trend in the market shares of larger companies and an increase in market concentration across both the life and non-life insurance sectors in Hungary. Traditional methods of indirect measurement indicate a prospective rise in market concentration and a potential decline in competitive conditions. However, when considering stationarity, the invariant distributions estimated via the Markov chain methodology suggest a decrease in the market shares of the largest companies, accompanied by a leveling effect among leading firms. This indicates that, assuming unchanged conditions over the past decade, the intrinsic processes of the market could lead to a less concentrated market structure in both the life and non-life insurance sectors of the Hungarian insurance market. Removing the stationarity assumption presents new opportunities for determining the equilibrium state of the insurance market under specific conditions. Future research will venture further in this direction. The objective is to develop a model capable of indirectly measuring market power, which will provide essential insights for competition authorities and management of market participants, even within asymmetric information contexts, regarding the anticipated trajectory of market structure transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Infrastructure Policy and DevelopmentSame topicInsurance and Financial Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207