MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406132013 · doi:10.55259/jiip.v30i2.27

Tingkat Penerapan Pengendalian Penyakit Mosaik Kuning Kacang Hijau Pada Petani Kacang Hijau Di Desa Bendungan Kecamatan Kuwarasan Kabupaten Kebumen

2023· article· id· W4406132013 on OpenAlexaff
Wasiman Wasiman

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Development and Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kendala teknis yang dihadapi petani kacang hijau salah satunya yaitu serangan organisme pengganggu tanaman (OPT) baik berupa hama, penyakit, maupun gulma. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui inovasi, sasaran, cara pengambilan keputusan, saluran komunikasi, dan penyuluh pertanian pada pada penerapan pengendalian penyakit mosaik kuning kacang hijau pada petani kacang hijau. Penelitian dilaksanakan mulai 10 Juni 2022 sampai 1 Agustus 2023 di Desa Bendungan, Kecamatan Kuwarasan, Kabupaten Kebumen. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kuantitatif dengan sampel sebanyak 30 orang yang berasal dari Kelompok Tani Mekar Jaya I dan Mekar Jaya I. Hasil penelitian menunjukan penerapan pengendalian penyakit mosaik kuning kacang hijau pada aspek inovasi memiliki kategori sedang dengan persentase 64,07%, aspek sasaran memiliki kategori sedang dengan persentase 62,70%, aspek cara pengambilan keputusan memiliki kategori sedang dengan persentase 67,78%, aspek saluran komunikasi memiliki kategori sedang dengan persentase 66,67%, dan aspek penyuluh pertanian memiliki kategori tinggi dengan persentase 85,93%. Pemberdayaan dilakukan untuk meningkatkan perilaku petani dalam mengambil keputusan pengendalian penyakit mozaik kacang hijau. Penyuluhan yang dilakukan mampu meningkatkan pengetahuan dan sikap petani dalam mengendalikam penyakit mozaik kuning sebesar 39,45 dan 36,33 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmu-Ilmu PertanianSame topicAgricultural Development and ManagementFrench-language works237,207