MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406135106 · doi:10.47439/jkras.2024.4.685

Establishment and Development of the Yeongsangang River Basin Jar Coffins

2024· article· en· W4406135106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Korean Archaeological Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoffinJARStructural basinBayQuarter (Canadian coin)ArchaeologyGeologyGeographyPaleontologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to archaeologically identify the establishment and developmental process of jar coffins, which are the traditional tombs of the Yeongsangang River basin during the Three Kingdoms period. The establishment of the jar coffin was judged to have occurred in the Miho River basin in the 3rd century. The Miho River basin and Seosanarea acted as a transportation hub connecting the Asan Bay area and Byeon·Jinhan, and functioned as thus until the Baekje Hanseong period. During this process, large jars from the Byeon·Jinhan area were introduced into the Asan Bay area, and the influence of this led tothe creation of the earliest Type I jar coffin of the Miho River basin. This type spread to the Yeongsangang River basin and developed into the typical TypeI jar coffin in the Gochang Asan-myeon area in the late 3rd century. The development of the jar coffin is characterized by changes in form and a shrinking distribution range. By the fourth quarter of the 4th century, the stage of the ⅠType jar coffin, it was widely distributed in the Mahan·Baekje region. In the first quarter of the 5th century, the ⅡB type jar coffin appeared, its distribution limited to the Yeongsangang River basin and developed into the jar coffin tomb. In the second quarter of the 5th century, the Ⅲ Type jar coffin appeared, the distribution of which was limited to the middle Yeongsangang River basin. In the fourth quarter of the 5thcentury, the process of social integration resulted in the standardization of the form of the ⅢType jar coffin, but the distribution of this type was reduced even further, before disappearing around the first half of the second quarter of the 6th century. The Naju Dasi-myeon and Bannam-myeon indigenous groups, the centers of jar coffin production, differed in political orientation. The Dasi-myeon group was more receptive to foreign cultures, while the Bannam-myeon adhered strongly to the tradition of jar coffins. This was a result of the geographical importance of the Dasi-myeon region overlapping with Baekje’s desire to subjugate the Yeongsangang River basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it