Invention of the Rock Pit Tombs of Okseong-ri, Pohang, and its Background
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reviews the period during which rock pit tombs came to be constructed around Okseong-ri, and the structure and distributional patterns of this tomb type. In addition, this subject is approached from the perspective that material culture is generated through the active strategies and actions of individuals in various contexts. Using this approach, the background of the construction of rock pit tombs and differences in tomb structure are examined, and inferences are made regarding the internal structure and trends of the groups that built such tombs. The results of the analysis show that the rock pit tomb flourished from the fourth quarter of the 5th century to the second quarter of the 6th century. In addition, the rock pit tomb was identified to be a combination of the stone chamber tomb with corridor or stone chamber tomb with horizontal entrance and the rock pit element. The background for this change was found in the situation of the Heunghae area at the time, the unstable social environment it triggered, as well as the geological environment in the area that was recognized and experienced. It is postulated that the tomb builders around Okseong-ri established the tradition of rock pit tombs with the intention of reinforcing group unity and cohesion against such a backdrop. Furthermore, rock pit tombs were classified into three categories: rock pit burial tombs, rock pit chamber tombs withhorizontal entrances, and rock pit chamber tombs with corridors. It was recognized that a certain degree of hierarchical differentiation existed between the tomb types, and that such differentiation existed not only between individuals but also between groups, with differential distribution patterns observed according to the burial ground. It is thought that this phenomenon resulted from the fact that the range of tomb elements made available through cultural exchange was determined by the social status of the tomb builders, and by the differential cultural choices made by the tomb builders in this context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".