MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406135796 · doi:10.46692/9781447370970.008

Planet Earth

2024· other· en· W4406135796 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrobiologyPlanetEarth (classical element)GeologyAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is largely a function of sociology's divisions into specialisms that studies of population health and health inequalities tend, with a small but growing number of honourable exceptions, to be conducted in terms of individual nation states; and that phenomena like climate change tend also to be explored in an academic silo. In this chapter it is argued that the era of the Anthropocene has compelled a global orientation too long neglected or denied in the fields of health and health care. At the start of the last chapter, different if provisional views on the beginning of the Anthropocene were noted. While as yet there is no consensus, a team of scientists has recently affirmed the existence of a new geological time period marking the start of humanity's impact on the planet. While humans began to have an impact on the planet a while ago, with the rise of widespread farming and later the Industrial Revolution, these developments remained geographically restricted. Colin Waters, representing the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG), has maintained that the Anthropocene is ‘visible globally’ in the top sediment layer of the Earth's surface, starting in the 1950s. The AWG declares that the Anthropocene is marked by the appearance of plutonium and other indicators of the surge in human activity typically called ‘the great acceleration’. Other ‘markers’ include the increasing consumption of fossil fuels, the greater use of nitrogen fertilisers and enhanced global trade spreading species across the planet and homogenising the plant and animal life of the planet. The AWG is focusing on Crawford Lake in Canada as a monitoring site. While some scientists still insist we are yet to leave the Holocene period, others deploy a different nomenclature for the emergence of the Anthropocene, including the Capitalocene and even the Proletariocene. Setting these disputes to one side, we can now agree on the nature and extent of recent climate change and its genesis in human activities. Ten of the warmest years since records were first kept 143 years ago have occurred since 2010. Although warming is not taking place uniformly across the plant, the upward trend in the globally averaged temperature shows that more areas are warming than cooling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial LifeFrench-language works237,207