MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406137808 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2025.3526793

Harmonically Mode-Locked Optoelectronic Oscillator Incorporating a Microwave Photonic Filter for Supermode Noise Suppression

2025· article· en· W4406137808 on OpenAlexaff
Guangying Wang, Quan Chen, Chao Song, Yiran Guan, Yuan Cao, Jiejun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhase noisedBcHarmonicMicrowaveOffset (computer science)OpticsOptoelectronicsNoise (video)Materials scienceInjection lockingPhysicsAcousticsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An actively and harmonically mode-locked optoelectronic oscillator (OEO) is demonstrated to generate a broadband microwave frequency comb (MFC) with a low near-carrier phase noise and a suppressed supermode noise. To achieve a low near-carrier phase noise, the OEO is designed to have a long feedback loop, to increase its Q factor. However, an OEO with a long loop has a large number of densely spaced longitudinal modes, making the OEO, if harmonically mode locked, have a high supermode noise. In this work, a novel approach to suppressing supermode noise by incorporating a microwave photonic filter (MPF) is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. The MPF deployed in the OEO loop has a free spectral range (FSR) equal to the harmonic mode locking frequency. This ensures that the desired longitudinal modes are selected, while the unwanted supermodes are effectively suppressed. The proposed approach is experimentally evaluated. For an OEO with 2nd-order and 3rd-order harmonic mode locking, by using a two-tap and three-tap MPF, the supermode suppression ratio is increased from 8 dB to 59 dB for 2nd-order harmonic mode locking and from 5 dB to 55 dB for 3rd-order harmonic mode locking, indicating the suppression ratio is increased by 51 dB and 50 dB as compared with a harmonically mode-locked OEO without an MPF. The phase noise of the proposed mode-locked OEO at an offset frequency of 10 kHz are measured to be about -94 dBc/Hz and -104 dBc/Hz at a central frequency of 10 GHz and 4 GHz, respectively. The proposed technique can also be utilized for higher order harmonically mode-locked OEOs, showing its capability for high-repetition-rate MFC generation with low near-carrier phase noise and low supermode noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207