MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406141534 · doi:10.1002/anie.202420485

Accessing Azetidines through Magnesium‐Mediated Nitrogen Group Transfer from Iminoiodinane to Donor‐Acceptor Cyclopropanes

2025· article· en· W4406141534 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ajay H. Bansode, Lifeng Yin, Mahmoud Afrasi, Yiyi Zhu, Marvin Parasram

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesYork UniversityNational Institutes of HealthPfizerNew York UniversityAmerican Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable
KeywordsChemistryNucleophileAmideLewis acids and basesChemoselectivityRing (chemistry)MagnesiumCatalysisAcceptorMedicinal chemistryLeaving groupCombinatorial chemistryTransition metalStereochemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein, we report a Lewis acid-mediated ring expansion of donor-acceptor cyclopropanes (DACs) to substituted azetidines via nucleophilic nitrogen group transfer from readily accessible iminoiodinane. This protocol operates under mild, transition-metal-free conditions, and showcases excellent chemoselectivity, along with broad functional group tolerance. We report for the first time that challenging alkyl donor-acceptor cyclopropanes can undergo ring expansion leading to aliphatic azetidines without relying on external oxidants or precious transition-metal catalysts. Mechanistically, the coordination of a magnesium (Mg)-Lewis acid to the DAC promotes nucleophilic ring opening with a putative Mg-amide species generated from the iminoiodinane under the reaction conditions to furnish the azetidine products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicCyclopropane Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207