MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406141707 · doi:10.1016/j.vgie.2025.01.002

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for treatment of afferent limb syndrome

2025· article· en· W4406141707 on OpenAlexaff
Hyun Jae Kim, Nicholas Holt, Roberto Trasolini

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoGIE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterostomySurgeryInternal medicineCancerGastrectomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Afferent limb syndrome (ALS) is an important yet underrecognized adverse event after gastrojejunostomy or Rouxen-Y reconstruction surgeries with diverted biliary limb.ALS refers to the obstruction of the afferent limb or biliary limb, leading to symptoms such as vomiting, abdominal pain, biliary obstruction, pancreatitis, and cholangitis.1 ALS can occur from several benign and malignant etiologies ranging from obstructing enteroliths, radiation enteritis, postsurgical adhesions, internal herniations, and recurrence of malignancy.Although the precise incidence of ALS remains uncertain, recent studies suggest it may be more common than previously believed.2,3 Although ALS traditionally has been treated by a surgical bypass or reconstruction, the optimal treatment strategy is not clearly established.Recent studies demonstrate that alternative endoscopic treatments can effectively manage ALS (Video 1, available online at www.videogie.org).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideoGIESame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207