MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406141787 · doi:10.1137/1.9781611978322.34

Approximating Traveling Salesman Problems Using a Bridge Lemma

2025· book-chapter· en· W4406141787 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScheduling and Timetabling Solutions
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTravelling salesman problemLemma (botany)Bridge (graph theory)Computer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationBiologyBotanyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We give improved approximations for two metric Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) variants. In Ordered TSP (OTSP) we are given a linear ordering on a subset of nodes o1,. .., ok. The TSP solution must have that o i+1 is visited at some point after Oi for each 1 ≤ i ≤ k. This is the special case of Precedence- Constrained TSP (PTSP) in which the precedence constraints are given by a single chain on a subset of nodes. In k-Person TSP Path (k-TSPP), we are given pairs of nodes (s1, t1), …, (sk, tk ). The goal is to find an si-ti path with minimum total cost such that every node is visited by at least one path.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.360
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.002 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it