MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406141970 · doi:10.1137/1.9781611978322.113

Streaming and Communication Complexity of Load-Balancing via Matching Contractors

2025· book-chapter· en· W4406141970 on OpenAlexaff
Sepehr Assadi, Aaron Bernstein, Zachary Langley, Lap Chi Lau, Robert Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatching (statistics)Computer scienceDistributed computingBusinessMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the load-balancing problem, we have an n-vertex bipartite graph G = (L, R, E ) between a set of clients and servers. The goal is to find an assignment of all clients to the servers, while minimizing the maximum load on each server, where load of a server is the number of clients assigned to it. Motivated by understanding the streaming complexity of this problem, we study load-balancing in the one-way (two-party) communication model: the edges of the input graph are partitioned between Alice and Bob, and Alice needs to send a short message to Bob for him to output a solution of the entire graph.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooksSame topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207