MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406143057 · doi:10.1137/1.9781611978315.24

Spectral Sparsification by Deterministic Discrepancy Walk

2025· book-chapter· en· W4406143057 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Approximation and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom walkStatistical physicsComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectral sparsification and discrepancy minimization are two well-studied areas that are closely related. Building on recent connections between these two areas, we generalize the “deterministic discrepancy walk” framework by Pesenti and Vladu [SODA 23] for vector discrepancy to matrix discrepancy, and use it to give a simpler proof of the matrix partial coloring theorem of Reis and Rothvoss [SODA 20]. Moreover, we show that this matrix discrepancy framework provides a unified approach for various spectral sparsification problems, from stronger notions including unit-circle approximation and singular-value approximation to weaker notions including graphical spectral sketching and effective resistance sparsification. In all of these applications, our framework produces improved results with a simpler and deterministic analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it