Gafchromic Films as a Complementary In-field Dosimetric Tool to Monitor Low Photon Radiation Doses (≤50 mSv)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This study elucidated the radiation response characteristics of a Gafchromic radiochromic film subjected to low photon doses of ≤50 mSv, which corresponds to the annual whole body effective dose limit for radiation workers in Canada. Radiochromic films are investigated for possible use as a complementary tool for the Canadian Armed Forces that can be worn in addition to their existing personal dosimetry to quickly assess personal radiation dose received from radiological hazards without reliance on electronics. The films were exposed to varying photon energies emanating from x-ray generators and radioisotopes, specifically cesium-137, cobalt-60, and americium-241. The resultant radiation-induced film darkening was quantitatively assessed employing three analytical methodologies: net optical density analysis, UV/Visible spectroscopic analysis, and Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopic analysis. Ideally, a film dosimeter necessitates a pronounced chromatic alteration and the capability to accurately quantify doses ≤50 mSv where net optical density analysis was identified as the optimal modality for interpreting the film darkening into a dose approximation. This new approach established a lower detection threshold of 7.6 mSv for the films when exposed to cesium-137 radiation. Notably, the film exhibited a linear dose response relationship in terms of net optical density; however, a photon energy-dependent variability was observed within the 0-100 mSv dose range. In conclusion, these Gafchromic radiochromic films present a promising candidate for military dosimetry applications. They offer a real-time, visual dose response that can be discerned by military personnel or analyzed using mobile spectroscopic instrumentation. Moreover, these films demonstrate proficiency in the accurate quantification of photon doses ≤50 mSv. Future investigations will evaluate the film's performance under heterogeneous and indeterminate radiation environments, as well as the impact of environmental conditions on the film's performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".