MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406144783 · doi:10.17161/sjm.v1i1.23103

The 2nd SAU Annual Conference on Urological Research

2024· article· en· W4406144783 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaoqi Liu, Benyi Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSerican Journal of Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerMedicineBanquetOpening ceremonyLibrary scienceCancerPolitical scienceInternal medicineHistoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Serican Academy of Urology (SAU), established in the fall of 2022, is an international non-profit organization dedicated to uniting clinicians and basic scientists to address diseases related to the genitourinary tract. Prostate cancer, particularly castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), remains a significant public health issue. The second annual SAU conference was held from June 13-16, 2024, at Banff Rocky Mountain Resorts, Alberta, Canada. Sponsored by MedChemExpress, ABclonal, and NovinoPath, and chaired by Dr. Xiaoqi Liu, the conference focused on the latest research in urological diseases. Topics included epigenetic regulation, novel treatment targets, bioinformatics, cancer etiology, progression and metastasis, the tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy, and overcoming resistance to existing therapies. Keynote addresses by leading scientists Drs. Jindan Yu and Qianben Wang emphasized the complexity of epigenetic and transcriptional regulation in prostate cancer. The Women’s Forum provided a platform to discuss career navigation and leadership development for women scientists in a predominantly male field. The conference concluded with a banquet, including an awards ceremony and committee reports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSerican Journal of MedicineSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207