MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406147770 · doi:10.1017/s0266462324002691

PP108 A Systematic Review Of Reactogenicity And Safety Of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine For Prevention Of Herpes Zoster In Adults

2024· review· en· W4406147770 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emma Reece, David Byrne, Constanza Riquelme‐Mc Loughlin, Joan Quigley, Conor Teljeur, Patricia Harrington, Máirín Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReactogenicityShinglesRandomized controlled trialObservational studyAdverse effectRashPlaceboCochrane LibrarySystematic reviewPediatricsInternal medicineMEDLINEImmunologyAlternative medicinePathologyImmunogenicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Herpes zoster (HZ), also known as shingles, is characterized by a vesicular skin rash, often associated with acute pain and itching. The safety profile of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in adults aged 50 years and older and in adults aged 18 and older who are at increased risk of HZ was assessed in this systematic review. Methods A comprehensive electronic search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and clinical trials registries. Searches were limited to the period from 2008 to July 2023. Article screening and data extraction were carried out by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane revised Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the quality of non-randomized studies. An adapted version of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used for the appraisal of quality of non-comparative studies. Results Eighteen RCTs, four observational cohort studies, seven single-arm trials, and 11 single-arm observational studies were identified. Compared with placebo, solicited local (RZV: 74.1 to 84.0%; placebo: 7.9 to 11.9%) and systemic reactions (RZV: 53.0 to 66.1%; placebo: 6 to 11.4%) were more common in the vaccinated cohorts. Reactions were generally transient and mild to moderate in intensity. The most frequent reactions reported were pain at the reaction site, fatigue, and myalgia. The incidence of potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDS), serious adverse events (SAEs), and fatalities was similar in vaccine and placebo groups. No SAEs, pIMDs, or deaths were reported as vaccine related. Conclusions The available data on RZV shows that while local and systemic adverse events are common with RZV, these are typically transient, and SAEs are uncommon in both the general population and those at increased risk of HZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.011
Bibliometrics0.0120.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.420 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207