Identification of the Optical Counterpart of the Fast X-Ray Transient EP240414a
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fast X-ray transients (FXTs) are extragalactic bursts of X-rays first identified in archival X-ray data and are now routinely discovered in real time by the Einstein Probe, which is continuously surveying the night sky in the soft (0.5–4 keV) X-ray regime. In this Letter, we report the discovery of the second optical counterpart (AT 2024gsa) to an FXT (EP 240414a). EP 240414a is located at a projected radial separation of 27 kpc from its likely host galaxy at z = 0.4018 ± 0.0010. The optical light curve of AT 2024gsa displays three distinct components. The initial decay from our first observation is followed by a rebrightening episode, displaying a rapid rise in luminosity to an absolute magnitude M r ∼ −21 after two rest-frame days. While the early optical luminosity and decline rate are similar to those of luminous fast blue optical transients, the color temperature of AT 2024gsa is distinctly red and we show that the peak flux is inconsistent with a thermal origin. The third component peaks at M i ∼ −19 at ≳16 rest-frame days post-FXT, and is compatible with an emerging supernova. We fit the riz-band data with a series of power laws and find that the decaying components are in agreement with gamma-ray burst afterglow models, and that the rebrightening may originate from refreshed shocks. By considering EP 240414a in context with all previously reported known-redshift FXT events, we propose that Einstein Probe FXT discoveries may predominantly result from (high-redshift) gamma-ray bursts, and thus appear to be distinct from the previously discovered lower-redshift, lower-luminosity population of FXTs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".