MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406154248 · doi:10.1128/msystems.01413-24

Targeted sequencing of <i>Enterobacterales</i> bacteria using CRISPR-Cas9 enrichment and Oxford Nanopore Technologies

2025· article· en· W4406154248 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuemSystems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersAustralian Research Data CommonsBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsCRISPRNanopore sequencingMinionMultilocus sequence typingBiologyKlebsiella pneumoniaeDNA sequencingGeneLocus (genetics)Cas9GeneticsMetagenomicsComputational biologyPlasmidIllumina dye sequencingEscherichia coliGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Sequencing DNA directly from patient samples enables faster pathogen characterization compared to traditional culture-based approaches, but often yields insufficient sequence data for effective downstream analysis. CRISPR-Cas9 enrichment is designed to improve the yield of low abundance sequences but has not been thoroughly explored with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) for use in clinical bacterial epidemiology. We designed CRISPR-Cas9 guide RNAs to enrich the human pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae , by targeting multi-locus sequence type (MLST) and transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, as well as common antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes and the resistance-associated integron gene intI1 . We validated enrichment performance in 20 K . pneumoniae isolates, finding that guides generated successful enrichment across all conserved sites except for one AMR gene in two isolates. Enrichment of MLST genes led to a correct allele call in all seven loci for 8 out of 10 isolates that had depth of 30× or more in these regions. We then compared enriched and unenriched sequencing of three human fecal samples spiked with K. pneumoniae at varying abundance. Enriched sequencing generated 56× and 11.3× the number of AMR and MLST reads, respectively, compared to unenriched sequencing, and required approximately one-third of the computational storage space. Targeting the intI1 gene often led to detection of 10–20 proximal resistance genes due to the long reads produced by ONT sequencing. We demonstrated that CRISPR-Cas9 enrichment combined with ONT sequencing enabled improved genomic characterization outcomes over unenriched sequencing of patient samples. This method could be used to inform infection control strategies by identifying patients colonized with high-risk strains. IMPORTANCE Understanding bacteria in complex samples can be challenging due to their low abundance, which often results in insufficient data for analysis. To improve the detection of harmful bacteria, we implemented a technique aimed at increasing the amount of data from target pathogens when combined with modern DNA sequencing technologies. Our technique uses CRISPR-Cas9 to target specific gene sequences in the bacterial pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae and improve recovery from human stool samples. We found our enrichment method to significantly outperform traditional methods, generating far more data originating from our target genes. Additionally, we developed new computational techniques to further enhance the analysis, providing a thorough method for characterizing pathogens from complex biological samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it