European Union Treaties, Directives, and Agreements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
European Union Treaties, Directives, and Agreements Agreement on the Gradual Abolition of Checks atCommon Borders of the Benelux, the Federal Republic of Germany and France, June , .Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement of June between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic, on the Gradual Abolition of Checks at Their Common Borders "Schengen Implementation Agreement" (). Resolution on the Exploitation of Prostitution and the Traffic in Human Beings, OJ (C ), Eur.Parl.Doc.(A-/) - () European Union, Treaty on European Union (Consolidated Version), Treaty of Maastricht, February , Official Journal of the European Communities, C / European Union, '//JHA: Council framework decision of March on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings' Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly, 'Recommendation No () on a campaign against trafficking in women' ( January ) Council of the European Union, 'Proposal for a comprehensive plan to combat illegal immigration and trafficking of human beings in the European Union', /C /,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.100 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".