CFTR as a therapeutic target for severe lung infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lung infection is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Even with appropriate antibiotic and antiviral treatment, mortality in hospitalized patients often exceeds 10%, highlighting the need for the development of new therapeutic strategies. Of late, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is-in addition to its well-established roles in the lung airway and extrapulmonary organs-increasingly recognized as a key regulator of alveolar homeostasis and defense. In the alveolar epithelium, CFTR mediates alveolar fluid secretion and liquid homeostasis; in the microvascular endothelium, CFTR maintains vascular barrier function. CFTR also contributes to alveolar immunity. Yet, in lung infection, diverse molecular mechanisms reduce CFTR abundance and otherwise impair its function, promoting alveolar inflammation, edema, and cell death. Preservation or restoration of CFTR function by CFTR modulator drugs thus presents a promising avenue to combat lung infection in a pathogen-independent manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".