Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We initiate to study a \(D\)-irregular labeling, which generalizes both non-inclusive and inclusive \(d\)-distance irregular labeling of graphs. Let \(G=(V(G),E(G))\) be a graph, \(D\) a set of distances, and \(k\) a positive integer. A mapping \(\varphi\) from \(V(G)\) to the set of positive integers \(\{1,2,\dots,k\}\) is called a \(D\)-irregular \(k\)-labeling of \(G\) if every two distinct vertices have distinct weights, where the weight of a vertex \(x\) is defined as the sum of labels of vertices whose distance from \(x\) belongs to \(D\). The least integer \(k\) for which \(G\) admits a \(D\)-irregular labeling is the \(D\)-irregularity strength of \(G\) and denoted by \(\mathrm{s}_D(G)\). In this paper, we establish several fundamental properties on \(D\)-irregularity strength for arbitrary graphs. We also determine this parameter exactly for families of graphs with small diameter or small maximum degree.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it