MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406182699 · doi:10.1177/10541373241310454

Mental Health, Family, and Work-Life Consequences of Pregnancy Loss: A Qualitative Study of Black Canadian Women

2025· article· en· W4406182699 on OpenAlexaffabout
Priscilla Boakye, Nadia Prendergast, Diana Mugambi, Ola Abanta Thomas Obewu

Bibliographic record

VenueIllness Crisis & Loss · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative researchMental healthPregnancyPsychologyMedicinePsychiatrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnancy loss is a traumatic event that has far-reaching consequences for affected women and their families. While most studies have focused on the immediate stressors Black women face after a pregnancy loss, little is known about the consequences beyond this period. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of Black Canadian women beyond the immediate period of pregnancy loss. Using an exploratory qualitative design, we purposely recruited and interviewed 32 Black Canadian women with lived experience of pregnancy loss. Guided by thematic analysis approach, we identified three themes: (a) experiencing mental health breakdown, (b) struggling to maintain emotional connection with family, and (c) dealing with the stress of returning to work. The findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the long-term impact of pregnancy loss on Black Canadian women's mental health, family, and work-life. Providing ongoing follow-up care is crucial to identifying and addressing the risk of depression and suicide that Black Canadian women experience after a pregnancy loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIllness Crisis & LossSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207