Understanding the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Financial Information Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research explores the adoption of blockchain technology in financial information systems, focusing on the motivations, barriers, and potential impacts on financial institutions. As blockchain continues to gain attention for its transformative capabilities, particularly in reducing operational costs, increasing efficiency, and enhancing security, the study investigates the reasons behind its adoption within the financial sector. Through qualitative analysis, the research identifies key drivers for adoption, including cost reduction through the elimination of intermediaries, the enhancement of transaction speed and security, and the ability to foster trust and transparency. Despite these advantages, the research also uncovers significant barriers, such as the integration of blockchain with legacy systems, regulatory uncertainty, technical complexity, and organizational resistance to change. The study also highlights the potential of blockchain to drive financial inclusion by providing underserved populations with access to secure and low-cost financial services. Additionally, the research examines the strategic considerations financial institutions must navigate, including the need for specialized knowledge, leadership support, and the importance of pilot testing before full-scale adoption. Finally, the study suggests that while blockchain adoption faces several challenges, its potential to revolutionize financial information systems is immense, with implications for the future of digital currencies, asset management, and cross-border payments. The research concludes by emphasizing the need for continued investment in blockchain technology and the collaboration between financial institutions, regulators, and fintech companies to realize its full potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".