MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

DNA Barcoding Reveals Diversity of <i>Cytospora</i> Species Associated with Branch Dieback and Canker Diseases of Woody Plants in Canada

2025· preprint· en· W4406185126 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Evgeny Ilyukhin, Svetlana Markovskaja

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCankerDNA barcodingBiologyBotanyEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Branch dieback and canker diseases caused by Cytospora species negatively affect health of woody plants worldwide. In this study, 59 Cytospora isolates were obtained from symptomatic trees and shrubs growing in southwest Ontario and Saskatchewan, Canada. DNA barcoding approach combined with morphological (culture) characterization identified 15 known species of Cytospora associated with the diseases: C. chrysosperma, C. curvata, C. euonymina, C. hoffmannii, C. kantschavelii, C. leucosperma, C. leucostoma, C. nitschkeana, C. piceae, C. populina, C. pruinopsis, C. pruinosa, C. ribis, C. schulzeri, and C. sorbina. The obtained results contribute to the study of diversity, host affiliation, geographical distribution, and pathogenicity of Cytospora species occurring on woody plants in both natural habitats and agricultural systems. The findings also support the effectiveness of using sequence barcodes (ITS, act1) in fungal taxonomy and plant pathology studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.org→Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→