MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406185715 · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2025.106131

Beyond density: Examining overlooked drivers of housing and neighborhood greenhouse gas emissions

2025· article· en· W4406185715 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Aldrick Arceo, Marianne F. Touchie, William O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Cities and Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGreenhouse gasEnvironmental scienceNatural resource economicsBusinessEconomicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Life cycle assessment was used to calculate housing and neighborhood GHG emissions. • Embodied and operational GHG impacts of the built environment are estimated. • Detached houses are more GHG intensive per capita than denser housing built forms. • GHG emissions are associated with built environment and socioeconomic characteristics. The built form of housing impacts virtually all infrastructure provision and lifestyle choices, particularly daily mobility patterns. The environmental impacts of these built environment interactions have been captured in previous housing life cycle assessments (LCA), but they have focused on ubiquitous built forms including detached homes and high-rise multi-unit residential buildings (MURB) and rarely examined the impacts of different neighborhood types. This study builds on previous LCA research that considered the impacts of buildings, transportation, and road infrastructure. Here, we critically examine the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of newly built housing forms including attached homes and low-rise MURBs, in addition to detached homes and high-rise MURBs. The GHG estimates are then extended to neighborhood levels and statistically analyzed using built environment and socioeconomic characteristics. Using this approach, we can better understand relationships between GHG emissions, household, and community parameters. Four housing built forms and 529 neighborhood case studies from Toronto, Canada were analyzed. The results show that attached homes and MURBs are 45–62 % less GHG intensive per capita than detached homes. Considering results at the neighborhood level, GHG emissions per capita decrease with higher density. We also find negative associations between GHG emissions per capita and household characteristics including household size, tenancy, and household income. The findings of this study highlight the need to integrate built forms, mobility, and transport infrastructure when assessing the potential greenhouse gas emissions of housing and neighborhoods. Besides aiming for density, the provision of walkable neighborhoods, low-emission modes of transport, and high-density housing forms (e.g., multi-unit residential buildings) can lead to low-GHG neighborhoods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainable Cities and SocietySame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207