MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406189683 · doi:10.18812/refc.2024.106.27.

Entre traditionalisme et modernité : une lecture de L’Été enchanté de Paule Daveluy

2024· article· fr· W4406189683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSociete d Etudes Franco-Coreennes · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publié en 1958, L’Été enchanté de Paule Daveluy marque le début de la modernisation du roman québécois pour adolescentes, s’éloignant des tendances conservatrices et moralisatrices de l’époque. Ce roman autobiographique explore la vie intérieure d’une jeune fille de 16 ans, décrivant son évolution psychologique et ses émotions avec soin. Bien que des éléments de modernité émergent, le récit reste ancré dans des valeurs traditionalistes, comme l’importance de la famille et de la religion. Sur le plan formel, le roman innove en adoptant un point de vue à la première personne, un procédé peu courant à l’époque. Il recourt également au passé pour donner la voix à la protagoniste adulte qui se remémore ses seize ans. Ainsi, tout en racontant l’action, l’héroïne commente ses émotions et ses réactions en tant que narratrice. En somme, L’Été enchanté oscille entre traditionalisme et modernité, et demeure une lecture précieuse pour les adolescentes, leur offrant une leçon de maturité, loin des idéologies nationalistes et des rô̂les traditionnels des femmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.016
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociete d Etudes Franco-CoreennesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207