Diez años de Merck: una década de evolución del arbitraje internacional en Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hace una década la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia resolvió negativamente una solicitud de exequátur presentada por los apoderados de tres sociedades extranjeras: (i) Merck y Co Inc.; (ii) Merck Frosst Canada Inc.; y (iii) Frosst Laboratories Inc. El objeto de la solicitud de exequátur era un "Laudo Interlocutorio Respecto de la Jurisdicción del Tribunal de Arbitramento", dictado por un tribunal de arbitramento internacional administrado por la Cámara de Comercio Internacional ("CCI") y cuya sede era la ciudad de Newark, estado de Nueva Jersey, Estados Unidos de América. Las partes demandantes en el arbitraje que dio origen al laudo eran las tres sociedades mencionadas (a las que nos referiremos colectivamente como las "Compañías Merck") y la demandada una sociedad colombiana, Tecnoquímicas S.A. ("Tecnoquímicas"). Esa decisión de la Corte Suprema y las controversias jurídicas que la rodearon moldearon gran parte de las instituciones jurídicas que sirven de fundamento para el arbitraje comercial internacional en Colombia. Muchos de sus efectos continúan vigentes hoy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".