MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406203377 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc123-17

Practical Research on Machine Vision Technology in Automated Inspection of Precision Components in Intelligent Manufacturing

2024· article· en· W4406203377 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zongqi Ge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHough transformArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMachine visionComputer scienceCalibrationEdge detectionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionObject detectionPattern recognition (psychology)Image processingImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study develops a stereoscopic vision system using a two-camera calibration method and BP neural networks combined with genetic algorithms to measure precision component dimensions. Images are processed using edge detection and Hough transform algorithms, and a machine vision-based inspection model is constructed. Bearing components are used as the research object to detect dimensions, edges, geometric parameters, and loose components under six angles. Maximum measurement deviation is 0.04 mm, and edge detection results are clear and concise. Geometric parameter deviations remain within [-5%, 5%], achieving high recognition accuracy. The detection model’s classification accuracy is 97.49%, with verification accuracy at 98.01%. Comprehensive false detection and leakage rates are 1.03% and 0.46%, respectively. The model demonstrates superior detection performance across various angles for bearing components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207