MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406209783 · doi:10.1002/alz.092470

Genetic contribution to the sex differences of tau pathologies in Alzheimer’s disease –APOE and beyond

2024· article· en· W4406209783 on OpenAlexaff
Yi‐Ting Wang, Joseph Therriault, Nesrine Rahmouni, Arthur C. Macedo, Stijn Servaes, Jaime Fernández Arias, Sulantha Mathotaarachchi, Jenna Stevenson, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolipoprotein EDiseaseBiologyAlzheimer's diseaseNeuroscienceGeneticsPsychologyEvolutionary biologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) disproportionately impacts females, who exhibit a higher tau load compared to males. Existing literature suggests that biological sex may alter the impact of APOE on tau pathology in AD. Nevertheless, the genetic factors contributing to sex differences in AD tau pathology, beyond the influence of APOE, have been minimally investigated. Methods This study included 2 well‐characterized AD cohorts: the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD, n=359) cohort and the ADNI cohort (n=283). All participants underwent APOE genotyping and PET imaging with radioligands targeting Aβ plaques and tau tangles respectively. Polygenic hazard score (PHS) was computed using 31 AD‐associated SNPs identified from a stepwise Cox proportional hazards model for each ADNI participant. Low and high PHS is defined as low: −1 SD, ∼16 percentile; and high: +1 SD, ∼84 percentile. Results Sex‐disaggregated voxel‐based analyses revealed higher tau‐PET SUVRs in female subjects with APOE4 allele(s) and high PHS (Figure 1). ANOVA tests also showed a significant difference in tau load in Braak I‐II ROIs between female E4 carriers and both male E4 carriers (P<0.05) and non‐carriers (P<0.0001). To illustrate the relationship between Aβ and tau, modulating by APOE4carriage status, non‐linear Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) trendlines were applied, demonstrating an initial rise in tau among female E4 carriers, succeeded by male E4 carriers (Figure 2). Subsequently, linear Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression analyses were conducted to explore the influence of PHS on the Aβ‐tau relationship. Notably, female individuals in the high PHS group exhibited the highest tau load under a comparable Aβ load compared to other groups (Figure 2). In line with this, regression analyses unveiled a modulating effect of PHS and sex on tau load in AD‐associated regions, and this effect remained statistically significant after adjusting for APOE4 carriage status (Table 1). Conclusions In the trajectory of Alzheimer's disease, early‐stage tau deposition was more pronounced in female individuals with the APOE4 allele. Our findings suggest exploring the polygenic architecture aids in identifying female individuals at the highest risk of developing tau pathology. This may be valuable for stratifying AD risk and as an enrichment strategy in clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207