Semi-supervised pipe video temporal defect interval localization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In sewer pipe closed-circuit television inspection, accurate temporal defect localization is essential for effective pipe assessment. Industry standards typically do not require time interval annotations, which are more informative but lead to additional costs for fully supervised methods. Additionally, differences in scene types and camera motion patterns between pipe inspections and temporal action localization (TAL) hinder the effective transfer of point-supervised TAL methods. Therefore, this study presents a semi-supervised multi-prototype-based method incorporating visual odometry for enhanced attention guidance (PipeSPO). The semi-supervised multi-prototype-based method effectively leverages both unlabeled data and time-point annotations, which enhances performance and reduces annotation costs. Meanwhile, visual odometry features exploit the camera's unique motion patterns in pipe videos, offering additional insights to inform the model. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that PipeSPO achieves 41.89% AP across intersection over union thresholds of 0.1–0.7, improving by 8.14% over current state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it