MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406210530 · doi:10.1111/mice.13403

Semi-supervised pipe video temporal defect interval localization

2025· article· en· W4406210530 on OpenAlexaff
Zhu Huang, Gang Pan, Chao Kang, Yaozhi Lv

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsWave Control Systems (Canada)
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Tianjin City
KeywordsComputer scienceIntersection (aeronautics)Artificial intelligenceVisual odometryOdometryInterval (graph theory)ExploitAnnotationVisual inspectionPoint (geometry)Computer visionMotion (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringRobotMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In sewer pipe closed-circuit television inspection, accurate temporal defect localization is essential for effective pipe assessment. Industry standards typically do not require time interval annotations, which are more informative but lead to additional costs for fully supervised methods. Additionally, differences in scene types and camera motion patterns between pipe inspections and temporal action localization (TAL) hinder the effective transfer of point-supervised TAL methods. Therefore, this study presents a semi-supervised multi-prototype-based method incorporating visual odometry for enhanced attention guidance (PipeSPO). The semi-supervised multi-prototype-based method effectively leverages both unlabeled data and time-point annotations, which enhances performance and reduces annotation costs. Meanwhile, visual odometry features exploit the camera's unique motion patterns in pipe videos, offering additional insights to inform the model. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that PipeSPO achieves 41.89% AP across intersection over union thresholds of 0.1–0.7, improving by 8.14% over current state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure EngineeringSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207