Microbial Nitrogen Removal in South San Francisco Bay: Does It Play a Role in Eutrophication Resistance?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The ecosystem response to anthropogenic nitrogen (N) loading in estuarine systems is determined by hydrodynamics, biogeochemical transformation rates, and other system-specific characteristics. Historically, San Francisco (SF) Bay has been an outlier from other estuaries with an unusual resistance to eutrophication, despite having extremely high rates of nitrogen loading. Recent increases in phytoplankton biomass and an unprecedented harmful algal bloom, however, have increased the urgency to understand rates and drivers of nitrogen removal in the system. To assess benthic N cycling rates, we conducted seasonal measurements across nine sites in South and Lower South SF Bay, the two sub-embayments with the highest rates of area-normalized N loading, to determine the rates and potential drivers of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA). Denitrification rates averaged 60.6 ± 8.1 µmol m −2 h −1 and were primarily coupled to nitrification. Denitrification rates were positively correlated with DNRA rates and % clay. DNRA rates ranged from 0 to 20 µmol m −2 h −1 and on an annual basis averaged ~ 10% of total benthic nitrate reduction, with a negative correlation to % clay content in the surface sediment. The measured denitrification rates account for the removal of, on average, 14% of N loaded annually to South SF Bay, leaving a sizeable portion for alternate fates (e.g., recycling, export, or burial) and potential for substantial temporal and spatial variability (1–79%). This identifies the relative importance of sediment denitrification in ecosystems characterized by high nutrients and low productivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".