Crafting an English Ebook for the Merdeka Curriculum: Insights from Indonesian High School Teachers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Need analysis is an essential component of Research & Development (R&D) and cannot be separated from the process as a whole. This study analyzed the need for an English ebook model based on the Merdeka curriculum for Indonesian Senior High Schools. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the study investigated the requirements for the research purpose. Data were collected through questionnaires from 68 English Senior High School teachers in Pandeglang, Banten Province, Indonesia, and analyzed qualitatively. The findings revealed that almost all English teachers agreed that the English coursebook should reflect the Merdeka curriculum, with a preference for interactive ebook formats. Both students and teachers expressed a need for an introductory English ebook as a learning medium in the classroom. Specifically, teachers emphasized the importance of incorporating local content and interactive elements. These findings provide a foundation for developing an English ebook model based on the Merdeka curriculum, tailored to the needs of Indonesian Senior High School students and aligned with current educational trends.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it