MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406214809 · doi:10.5430/jct.v14n1p19

The Driving Force for Sustaining Future Competencies for University Students in the Digital Era: Learning Strategies

2025· article· en· W4406214809 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zheng Jie, Kyu Tae Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital literacy in education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital literacyMetacognitionPsychologyKnowledge managementDigital learningResource (disambiguation)Engineering ethicsCognitionPublic relationsPedagogyPolitical scienceEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores how learning strategies act as key drivers in strengthening sustainable competencies among university students in the digital age. As issues such as misinformation, cyberbullying, and online fraud increasingly threaten personal and societal well-being, digital literacy has become a critical competency. Learning strategies, particularly metacognitive self-regulation and resource management, play a crucial role in enhancing digital literacy by facilitating the critical evaluation of information and ethical decision-making. These strategies interact with digital literacy to foster core competencies—encompassing cognitive, emotional, and social abilities—which enable students to navigate complex digital environments responsibly and ethically. In this way, students not only enhance their capacity for critical thinking and problem-solving but also contribute to societal progress and pursue personal well-being in an increasingly digital world. This study employs a quantitative research design, using surveys with university students and random sampling to examine the relationship between learning strategies and digital literacy. The findings reveal that while cognitive strategies alone had limited effects, metacognitive self-regulation and resource management strategies were essential in translating digital literacy into practical skills. These skills empower students to critically assess information, identify credible sources, and navigate ethical challenges in both academic and real-world contexts. The results underscore the importance of embedding targeted learning strategies, particularly metacognitive self-regulation and resource management, within educational frameworks. These strategies help cultivate resilient, responsible digital citizens who are capable of addressing the ethical and practical challenges posed by the digital era. By equipping students with the necessary tools to engage responsibly and ethically in digital spaces, higher education institutions can foster the development of autonomous, reflective learners prepared for the complexities of the digital world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and TeachingSame topicDigital literacy in educationFrench-language works237,207