Sorption of Phenolic Compounds from Woodwaste Leachate by Peat Media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study contributes to the clarification of sorption mechanism of phenolic compounds in woodwaste leachate by peat, and it is a part of the project which aims to clarify and contribute to determine and evaluate the sorption mechanism part of phenolic compounds in a trickling biofilter. To achieve this objective, mechanisms were studied separately by isolation of each process, and sorption mechanism was followed in the present study by inhibiting the biological process. The kinetic study showed that the maximum sorption capacity was reached between 20 and 24 h at 10°C and between 16 and 20 h at 20°C. However, it is during the first hours that the sorption process is high. The maximum sorption capacity was evaluated at 68.5 mg/kg (57.87% of the initial concentration) for the most polar compounds: 4-nitrophenol, phenol, and 2-chlorophenol and at 35.2 mg/kg of peat for the least polar compounds such as 2,4-dimethylphenol under conditions of pH 4 and at 10°C. The description of sorption results was evaluated by a kinetic and thermodynamic study and modeling by Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".