MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406217760 · doi:10.3390/fib13010005

Amplifying the Sensitivity of Electrospun Polyvinylidene Fluoride Piezoelectric Sensors Through Electrical Polarization Process for Low-Frequency Applications

2025· article· en· W4406217760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFibers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolyvinylidene fluoridePiezoelectricityElectric fieldPiezoelectric coefficientDielectricElectrostrictionPolarization (electrochemistry)Composite materialVoltageOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Piezoelectric sensors convert mechanical stress into electrical charge via the piezoelectric effect, and when fabricated as fibers, they offer flexibility, lightweight properties, and adaptability to complex shapes for self-powered wearable sensors. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofibers have garnered significant interest due to their potential applications in various fields, including sensors, actuators, and energy-harvesting devices. Achieving optimal piezoelectric properties in PVDF nanofibers requires the careful optimization of polarization. Applying a high electric field to PVDF chains can cause significant mechanical deformation due to electrostriction, leading to crack formation and fragmentation, particularly at the chain ends. Therefore, it is essential to explore methods for polarizing PVDF at the lowest possible voltage to prevent structural damage. In this study, a Design of Experiments (DoE) approach was employed to systematically optimize the polarization parameters using a definitive screening design. The main effects of the input parameters on piezoelectric properties were identified. Heat treatment and the electric field were significant factors affecting the sensor’s sensitivity and β-phase fraction. At the highest temperature of 120 °C and the maximum applied electric field of 3.5 kV/cm, the % β-phase (F(β)) exceeded 95%. However, when reducing the electric field to 1.5 kV/cm and 120 °C, the % F(β) ranged between 87.5% and 90%. The dielectric constant (ɛ′) of polarized PVDF was determined to be 30 at an electric field frequency of 1 Hz, compared to a value of 25 for non-polarized PVDF. The piezoelectric voltage coefficient (g33) for polarized PVDF was measured at 32 mV·m/N at 1 Hz, whereas non-polarized PVDF exhibited a value of 3.4 mV·m/N. The findings indicate that, in addition to a high density of β-phase dipoles, the polarization of these dipoles significantly enhances the sensitivity of the PVDF nanofiber mat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it