MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406217760 · doi:10.3390/fib13010005

Amplifying the Sensitivity of Electrospun Polyvinylidene Fluoride Piezoelectric Sensors Through Electrical Polarization Process for Low-Frequency Applications

2025· article· en· W4406217760 on OpenAlexafffund
Asra Tariq, Amir Hossein Behravesh, Muhammad Rizwan Tariq, Ghaus Rizvi

Bibliographic record

VenueFibers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolyvinylidene fluoridePiezoelectricityElectric fieldPiezoelectric coefficientDielectricElectrostrictionPolarization (electrochemistry)Composite materialVoltageOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Piezoelectric sensors convert mechanical stress into electrical charge via the piezoelectric effect, and when fabricated as fibers, they offer flexibility, lightweight properties, and adaptability to complex shapes for self-powered wearable sensors. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofibers have garnered significant interest due to their potential applications in various fields, including sensors, actuators, and energy-harvesting devices. Achieving optimal piezoelectric properties in PVDF nanofibers requires the careful optimization of polarization. Applying a high electric field to PVDF chains can cause significant mechanical deformation due to electrostriction, leading to crack formation and fragmentation, particularly at the chain ends. Therefore, it is essential to explore methods for polarizing PVDF at the lowest possible voltage to prevent structural damage. In this study, a Design of Experiments (DoE) approach was employed to systematically optimize the polarization parameters using a definitive screening design. The main effects of the input parameters on piezoelectric properties were identified. Heat treatment and the electric field were significant factors affecting the sensor’s sensitivity and β-phase fraction. At the highest temperature of 120 °C and the maximum applied electric field of 3.5 kV/cm, the % β-phase (F(β)) exceeded 95%. However, when reducing the electric field to 1.5 kV/cm and 120 °C, the % F(β) ranged between 87.5% and 90%. The dielectric constant (ɛ′) of polarized PVDF was determined to be 30 at an electric field frequency of 1 Hz, compared to a value of 25 for non-polarized PVDF. The piezoelectric voltage coefficient (g33) for polarized PVDF was measured at 32 mV·m/N at 1 Hz, whereas non-polarized PVDF exhibited a value of 3.4 mV·m/N. The findings indicate that, in addition to a high density of β-phase dipoles, the polarization of these dipoles significantly enhances the sensitivity of the PVDF nanofiber mat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFibersSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207