Asian Cohort for Alzheimer’s Disease (ACAD) Study on Genetic and Non‐Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease among Asian Americans and Canadians
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Asian Americans and Asian Canadians (ASACs) are the fastest growing minority group in the US and Canada. However, ASACs are under‐sampled in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research. To address the need of culturally appropriate clinical protocols and community‐based recruitment approaches for ASACs, the Asian Cohort for Alzheimer’s Disease (ACAD), the first large dementia genetics cohort focusing on Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese, launched in 2021 to examine genetic and non‐genetic risk factors for AD among ASACs. Our clinical and community‐based participatory research (CPBR) scientists have a long collaborative history and diverse cultural and scientific training backgrounds: both are critical in leading AD and CBPR research. Method Upon receipt of an NIA U19 grant in 2023, ACAD has expanded to 9 recruiting sites (7 US and 2 Canadian), a coordinating site, and an analysis site with a centralized data management system. ACAD developed a comprehensive study protocol including community outreach and recruitment strategies, the data collection packet (DCP), pre‐screening and sample collection procedures, and in English, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese), Korean, and Vietnamese. To ensure consistency, ACAD implemented a training curriculum for data/sample collect and for culturally appropriate recruitment approaches in collaboration with community partners, clinics, and nursing homes serving Asian communities. Result As of December 2023, more than 2,400 people expressed interests in ACAD. A total of 683 of the 899 consented participants completed DCP data into the REDCap (604 Chinese, 54 Korean, and 25 Vietnamese), while 399 saliva samples and 285 blood samples were received. Participants aged 60 –103 years at enrollment, 67% were female, and 47% reported having a college or above education. Currently, ACAD is revising the study protocol in response to feedback received in its pilot phase, including the need to include additional neuropsychological tests and cultural tailored lifestyle questionnaires with an emphasis on immigration experiences. Conclusion The ACAD team (including community partners) have learned valuable lessons and demonstrated the feasibility of recruiting ASACs in clinical research. With an expansion plan and in collaboration with other AD research focuses on racial minority populations, insights from ACAD may identify potential novel, population‐specific therapeutic pathways for AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".