A Novel Image Processing-Based Method for Wind-Induced Vibration Response Prediction and Structural Monitoring of Long-Span Bridges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a crucial component of modern transportation infrastructure, long-span bridges are subject to wind-induced vibrations that pose a key issue in structural safety studies.Windinduced vibrations not only lead to dynamic deformation of the bridge but may also cause structural fatigue and failure.Therefore, accurately predicting and monitoring the windinduced vibration responses is essential for ensuring the safe operation of bridges.With the rapid development of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technology and machine learning algorithms, the integration of image processing and intelligent algorithms for monitoring and predicting wind-induced vibrations of long-span bridges has emerged as a promising research direction.Although significant progress has been made in monitoring and analyzing wind-induced vibrations, traditional methods often struggle with accurately capturing the evolution of minute deformations and achieving efficient predictions, thus limiting their practical application.This paper proposes a novel method for wind-induced vibration response prediction and structural monitoring of long-span bridges based on image processing.First, DIC technology is used to characterize the structural evolution of the bridge during wind-induced vibrations, capturing small deformations and local deformation features.Then, an image processing algorithm is applied to measure and calculate the structural evolution during the vibration response, enabling a quantitative analysis of the damage caused by wind load.Finally, by combining Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN), and Self-Attention (SA) mechanism, a prediction model is developed to accurately forecast the bridge's dynamic response behavior under varying wind speeds.The study shows that this method effectively captures the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of the wind-induced vibration process, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the predictions, thus providing a scientific basis for the health monitoring and maintenance of long-span bridges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".