Predicting Cognitive Decline: A Comprehensive Study On relative Brain Age, Cognitive Reserve, And Longitudinal Changes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Brain age is a metric that can be determined through anatomical measurements obtained from MRI scans. Relative brain age (RBA) reflects the difference in brain morphometry for an individual relative to a comparison group at a similar chronological age. Increased RBA was found related to poor physical health, neurodegeneration, increase RBA, cognitive decline, and mortality risk. The concept of cognitive reserve (CR), operationalized by merging education, complexity of occupation, and verbal IQ, explains on the other hand how individuals seem able to tolerate the impact of age‐related and/or neurodegenerative changes. This study aimed at exploring the relationship between RBA, CR, and cognitive performance. Method We assessed cognitively healthy and MCI individuals from the ADNI study on four cognitive domains (verbal episodic memory; language and semantic memory; attention; executive functions) at each follow‐up visit up to 5 years. First, we employed robust statistical models, including Generalized Linear Models(GLM), to investigate the association between baseline variables and cognitive performance changes over different follow‐up intervals. Secondly, we used support vector regression models to predict cognitive performance over multiple follow‐up periods. We employed 10‐fold cross‐validation to assess the predictive accuracy of the model. Finally, we used GLM to assess the link between RBA and CR with the speed of cognitive changes during a 36‐month period. Result Our findings reveal that in MCI group, RBA significantly contributes to the variance in verbal episodic memory changes across various time intervals. To predict cognitive performance, our support vector regression model demonstrated robust performance, yielding low mean absolute errors for episodic memory (0.305 to 0.523), attention (0.392 to 0.661), language and semantic memory (0.369 to 0.537), and executive function (0.386 to 0.521) across diverse follow‐up periods. RBA was further associated with a slower decline in verbal episodic memory, attention, language and semantic memory. These findings underscore the significant predictive role of RBA in estimating the speed of decline in cognitive performance within the MCI group. Conclusion We have shown how RBA interacts with CR, in shaping cognitive performance and aging trajectories. Our findings underscore the pivotal role of RBA in influencing future cognitive decline, offering valuable insights for early clinical detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".