MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406224940 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2024-4013

Human Activities Caused Hypoxia Expansion in a Large Eutrophic Estuary: Non-negligible Role of Riverine Suspended Sediments

2025· preprint· en· W4406224940 on OpenAlexaff
Yue Nan, Zheng Chen, Bin Wang, Bo Liang, Jiatang Hu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersSouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou)National Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)EutrophicationEstuaryNutrientSedimentBiogeochemical cycleEnvironmental sciencePhosphorusDeoxygenationHydrology (agriculture)OxygenOceanographyEnvironmental chemistryEcologyGeologyChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Increase in riverine nutrient loads was generally recognized as the primary cause of coastal deoxygenation, whereas the role of other riverine factors, especially suspended sediments, has received less attention. This study aims to discern the impacts of anthropogenic alterations in various riverine inputs on the subsurface deoxygenation over the past three decades in a large river-dominated estuary, the Pearl River Estuary (PRE). By utilizing the physical-biogeochemical model, we reproduced the observed dissolved oxygen (DO) conditions off the PRE in the historical period (the 1990s with high-suspended sediments-DO and low-nutrient inputs) and the present period (the 2010s with low-suspended sediments-DO and high-nutrient inputs). Due to the decadal changes in riverine inputs, the PRE has witnessed more extensive and persistent low-oxygen events during summer in the 2020s, with larger spatial extents of ~2926 km2 for low oxygen (DO < 4 mg/L, increased by ~148 % relative to the 1990s) and 617 km2 for hypoxia (DO < 3 mg/L, by 192 %) and longer duration (by ~15–35 days), evolving into three distinct hypoxic centers controlled by different factors. Model experiments suggested that the decreased riverine DO content (46 %) has led to a low-oxygen expansion in the upper regions, accounting for 44 % to the total increment. Meanwhile, the increased nutrient levels (100 % in nitrogen and 225 % in phosphorus) and the declined suspended sediment concentration (60 %) have jointly promoted the primary production and bottom oxygen consumptions (dominated by sediment oxygen uptake), thus resulting in a substantial enlargement of low-oxygen area (104 %) and hypoxic area (192 %) in the lower reaches. Our results revealed a more critical role of the riverine suspended sediment decline in the exacerbation of eutrophication and deoxygenation off the PRE via improving light conditions to support higher local productivity, which could further amplify the effect combined with the growth in nutrients and confound the effectiveness of hypoxia mitigation under nutrient controls. Overall, in the context of global changes in riverine suspended sediments, it is imperative to reassess the contribution of riverine inputs to the coastal deoxygenation worldwide over the past decades, given that the impact of suspended sediments has been constantly overlooked in relevant investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→