MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406225155 · doi:10.1111/maps.14301

Petrology and shock history of hybrid lunar feldspathic–troctolitic breccia Northwest Africa 11515

2025· article· en· W4406225155 on OpenAlexafffund
Yaozhu Li, P. J. A. McCausland, R. L. Flemming, G. R. Osinski

Bibliographic record

VenueMeteoritics and Planetary Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsBrecciaGeologyShock (circulatory)GeochemistryAstrobiologyPetrologyPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lunar impact breccia meteorites contain clasts from unknown lunar regions, including areas not studied by past missions. These meteorites offer a unique opportunity to expand our knowledge of the Moon's crustal and mantle composition and processes. The recently classified lunar meteorite Northwest Africa (NWA) 11515 is a moderately shocked feldspathic breccia with anorthite plagioclase and mafic minerals. In this work, we report the shock history of lithic clasts using 2‐D micro‐X‐ray diffraction, detailed mineralogy from micro‐X‐ray fluorescence, and electron probe microanalysis. NWA 11515 shows moderately shocked anorthite and highly shocked olivine and pyroxene. The plagioclase composition is invariant (An96.4 ± 0.7, n = 52), with variable mafic clasts overlapping Mg‐ and FAN‐suite lithologies (Mg# 84.5 to 45.6 for olivine; Mg# 85.6 to 32.2 for pyroxene), similar to KREEP‐depleted troctolites in Allan Hills A81005. Spinel‐group oxides vary from aluminous spinel to chromite and ulvöspinel. We also observed slow‐cooled augite Ca‐poor pyroxene exsolution clasts and fast‐quenched fine‐grained anorthite–olivine co‐crystallized clasts (<5 μm), indicating different cooling histories. Combining petrological observations with published geochemical data, we show NWA 11515 has the mixed lithology of ferroan anorthosites with KREEP‐poor magnesian rock fragments. With shock analysis, the materials are likely from a crater with minimum size of 7 km. Finally, we examined the published geochemical data for other lunar meteorites and hypothesize that other typical feldspathic breccias could contain magnesian clasts, suggesting the subdivision of typical feldspathic breccia into magnesian clast‐hosting breccia and ferroan feldspathic breccia. This implies that non‐KREEP magnesian magmatism might be more widespread in the post‐LMO era on lunar highlands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeteoritics and Planetary ScienceSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207