MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406226766 · doi:10.54254/2753-8818/2024.19966

Experimental Design: Investigating the Role of Autophagy and BDNF in Neuronal Death Under Chronic Stress

2025· article· en· W4406226766 on OpenAlexaff
Yiru Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueTheoretical and Natural Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutophagyChronic stressStress (linguistics)NeurosciencePsychologyBiologyApoptosisGeneticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic stress impairs adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) by reducing the survival and proliferation of neural stem cells (NSCs) in the dentate gyrus. Central to this process is cortisol, which interacts with the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and represses Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) transcription, leading to NSC death and disrupted AHN. Autophagy, a cellular degradation process, plays a dual role in cell survival and death under chronic stress. This study investigates the interplay between cortisol, BDNF, and autophagy in influencing NSC viability and AHN. Using human iPSC-derived NSCs, we explore whether GR activation reduces BDNF levels, leading to increased autophagy and cell death, or if other pathways are involved. The study also determines whether cortisol impacts BDNF synthesis, its signaling via the TrkB receptor, or both. Our research employs genetic manipulations, cortisol treatments, and assays to quantify autophagy and cell viability under stress. Understanding these mechanisms could provide insights into stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders and inform therapeutic strategies to enhance brain resilience and function under chronic stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheoretical and Natural ScienceSame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207