Arising amitraz and pyrethroids resistance mutations in the ectoparasitic Varroa destructor mite in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor remains a great threat for the beekeeping industry, for example contributing to excessive winter colony loss in Canada. For decades, beekeepers have sequentially used the registered synthetic varroacides tau -fluvalinate, coumaphos, amitraz, and flumethrin, leading to the risk of resistance evolution in the mites. In addition to the widespread resistance to coumaphos and pyrethroids, a decline in amitraz efficacy has recently been reported in numerous beekeeping regions in Canada. The goals of this study were to assess the evolution of resistance to amitraz in Canadian mite populations and to evaluate the presence and incidence of mutations previously associated with resistance to amitraz and pyrethroids in V. destructor . Our bioassay results confirmed the presence of amitraz-resistant mites in the population of Alberta. These phenotypic results were complemented by targeted genotyping of the octopamine receptor gene Octβ 2 R which revealed the presence of the mutation Y215H in 90% of tested apiaries with local allele frequencies ranging from 5 to 95%. The phenotypic resistance showed a significant correlation with the presence of this mutation across apiaries. In parallel, the L925I and L925M mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel were identified in 100% of the tested apiaries with frequencies ranging from 33 to 97%, suggesting that resistance to pyrethroids remains widespread. These results support the notion that the practice of relying on a single treatment for a prolonged period can increase rates of resistance to current varroacides. Our findings suggest the need for large-scale resistance monitoring via genotyping to provide timely information to beekeepers and regulators. This will enable them to make an effective management plan, including rotation of available treatments to suppress or at least delay the evolution of resistance in V. destructor populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".