Primer Consenso Argentino sobre el manejo del Trastorno por Déficit de Atención e Hiperactividad en la adultez. Primera parte: introducción, metodología de trabajo y generalidades
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has traditionally been understood as a condition primarily associated with childhood. However, growing evidence indicates that ADHD persists into adulthood, manifesting in various ways. Despite its prevalence and significant impact on daily life, adult ADHD has been considerably underestimated and underdiagnosed, resulting in a substantial burden for affected individuals, as well as their families and social environment. This comprehensive review aims to explore the complexity of ADHD in adulthood by addressing its etiology, definition, clinical presentation, risk factors, common comorbidities, evaluation methods, and neuropsychological aspects, alongside both pharmacotherapeutic and non-pharmacotherapeutic approaches for treatment. Additionally, the implications for diagnosis and treatment are examined, emphasizing the need for a thorough understanding of this condition. Through this document, the Argentine Association of Biological Psychiatry (Asociación Argentina de Psiquiatría Biológica, AAPB) not only seeks to compile and analyze the evidence on adult ADHD but also to provide a practical guide for healthcare professionals treating this disorder. The ultimate goal of this article is to contribute to the development of effective strategies for the evaluation and management of ADHD, ultimately improving the quality of life for patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".