MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LaGDif: Latent Graph Diffusion Model for Efficient Protein Inverse Folding with Self-Ensemble

2024· article· en· W4406238010 on OpenAlexaff
Tai Te Wu, Yu Guang Wang, Yiqing Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInverseGraphTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein inverse folding aims to identify viable amino acid sequences that can fold into given protein structures, enabling the design of novel proteins with desired functions for applications in drug discovery, enzyme engineering, and biomaterial development. Diffusion probabilistic models have emerged as a promising approach in inverse folding, offering both feasible and diverse solutions compared to traditional energy-based methods and more recent protein language models. However, existing diffusion models for protein inverse folding operate in discrete data spaces, necessitating prior distributions for transition matrices and limiting smooth transitions and gradients inherent to continuous spaces, leading to suboptimal performance. Drawing inspiration from the success of diffusion models in continuous domains, we introduce the Latent Graph Diffusion Model for Protein Inverse Folding (LaGDif). LaGDif bridges discrete and continuous realms through an encoder-decoder architecture, transforming protein graph data distributions into random noise within a continuous latent space. Our model then reconstructs protein sequences by considering spatial configurations, biochemical attributes, and environmental factors of each node. Additionally, we propose a novel inverse folding self-ensemble method that stabilizes prediction results and further enhances performance by aggregating multiple denoised output protein sequence. Empirical results on the CATH dataset demonstrate that LaGDif outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques, achieving up to 45.55% improvement in sequence recovery rate for single-chain proteins and maintaining an average RMSD of 1.96 Å between generated and native structures. These advancements of LaGDif in protein inverse folding have the potential to accelerate the development of novel proteins for therapeutic and industrial applications. The code is public available at https://github.com/TaoyuW/LaGDif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207