MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406247713 · doi:10.18280/ts.410628

Enhanced Autism Spectrum Disorder Facial Expression Recognition Using Hybrid Weighed Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization with Fast Mask Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network

2024· article· en· W4406247713 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ezhumalai Periyathambi

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationAutism spectrum disorderConvolutional neural networkQuantumComputer scienceSpeech recognitionFacial expressionRecurrent neural networkArtificial intelligenceAutismExpression (computer science)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial neural networkAlgorithmPhysicsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) affects brain development, impacting socialization, communication, and creativity in children.Signs typically appear within the first three years, with many children struggling with language acquisition, affecting their learning abilities.Various treatments help manage behaviors, benefiting both children and their parents.The mechanisms by which visual information about facial expressions translates into emotional categories are not well understood.This study proposes a system-level explanation through predictive processing theory.An innovative method combining Fast Mask Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network (FMRCNN) and hybrid Weighed Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization (WQPSO) aims to improve recognition of abnormal facial movements in individuals with ASD.FMRCNN captures temporal relationships and extracts features from input data, while the fast mask mechanism enhances network speed and efficiency by focusing on relevant input regions.The proposed method leverages predictive processing to improve accuracy and efficiency in facial expression recognition.It can identify six emotions: anger, fear, joy, sadness, surprise, and disgust.Results show significant potential in supporting ASD-related challenges, achieving 99.8% accuracy, 99.8% precision, 100% recall, and 94% specificity, surpassing existing systems in ASD facial expression recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207