MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406250240 · doi:10.18280/ts.410638

Image Classification and Retrieval of TCM Materials Based on Feature Enhancement

2024· article· en· W4406250240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdvanced Computing and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHubei University
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceInformation retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the global promotion and application of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), the identification and management of TCM materials have become critical issues that need to be addressed.Traditional methods for identifying TCM materials rely on manual experience and expert knowledge, leading to low efficiency and a high likelihood of errors.With the development of image processing technology, image-based classification and retrieval of TCM materials have gradually become a research hotspot.However, existing methods often encounter challenges such as insufficient classification accuracy and low retrieval efficiency when faced with the diversity and complexity of TCM material images.Therefore, how to effectively extract image features and improve the accuracy of classification and retrieval has become the central challenge in current research.Traditional image features, such as color, shape, and texture, are commonly used in the classification and retrieval of TCM materials.However, these features are often unable to fully reflect the diversity and detail of the materials, especially when distinguishing between morphologically similar materials.Although deep learning techniques have made breakthroughs in the field of image processing, the application of deep learning in TCM material image classification still faces many challenges due to insufficient data and annotation.A combination of technologies, including superpixel segmentation, feature point extraction, and clustering encoding, provides an effective approach to improving classification and retrieval performance and warrants further research.A kind of feature enhancement-based method for the classification and retrieval of TCM material images was proposed in this study, consisting of four main components.First, fine image segmentation was performed using the Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) superpixel segmentation technique to extract features; second, an initial classification method based on feature points was used to perform coarse classification of the TCM material images; third, clustering algorithms were employed to encode features and perform initial sorting; and finally, the image retrieval results were optimized through reordering based on the initial sorting.Experimental results demonstrate that the methods effectively enhance the classification accuracy and retrieval efficiency of TCM material images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it