MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406254300 · doi:10.1002/plr2.20404

Registration of ‘Yukon Gold’ yellow bean

2025· article· en· W4406254300 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Halima E. Awale, Evan M. Wright, James D. Kelly, Scott Bales

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plant Registrations · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityMichigan State University
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ‘Yukon Gold’ (Reg. no. CV‐363, PI 706256) yellow bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.), developed by Michigan State University AgBioResearch was released in 2024 as an upright, determinate, bush type, mid‐season cultivar with a bright yellow seedcoat. Yukon Gold was developed using the pedigree breeding method to F 4 generation followed by pure line selection for disease, agronomic, and quality traits. In 4 year of field trials, Yukon Gold yielded 3116 kg ha −1 , flowered in 43 days, and matured in 96 days on average. Plants averaged 38.9 cm in height, with a lodging resistance score of 1.8 and seed weight of 43.1 g 100 seed −1 . Yukon Gold is well adapted to growing conditions in Michigan and produces seeds with an intense yellow seedcoat color (highlighter color), which is brighter than others yellow bean cultivars. Yukon Gold is resistant to lodging and possesses a determinate upright growth habit with tolerance to white mold. Yukon Gold is resistant to Bean common mosaic virus , is susceptible to anthracnose race 7 and common bacterial blight. Yukon Gold cooks in 31 min and produces excellent seed color that exceeds industry standards for the yellow bean market class.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plant RegistrationsSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207